Accelerating AM component design workflow with new optimisation technology

Additive Manufacturing promises huge benefits for industry, but exploiting these in practice can prove difficult. For example, although truss-like component forms will often be found to be much more structurally efficient than traditional forms, identifying these has thus far been laborious and time-consuming. However, a new optimisation approach means that engineers can now directly identify optimised truss forms for AM components, saving time and effort. Prof. Matthew Gilbert of LimitState and the Advanced Additive Manufacturing (AdAM) Centre at the University of Sheffield outlines the technology and its application. [First published in Metal AM Vol. 3 No. 1, Spring 2017 | 5 minute read | View on Issuu | Download PDF]

Accelerating AM component design workflow with new optimisation technology
Fig. 1 A metal AM isostatic mount for a satellite optimised with LimitState:FORM software

Additive Manufacturing processes are developing rapidly and are now increasingly being used to produce high value metallic components for the aerospace, automotive and space sectors. In parallel, structural optimisation techniques are also maturing rapidly and engineers can now identify the optimal form for many problems. These new forms are often geometrically complex, and are ideally suited for AM fabrication.

In recent years, engineers have used topology optimisation techniques to generate optimal forms using tools such as Altair OptiStruct and Inspire. This approach works well when the component occupies a relatively large proportion of the available design space – when the so-called ‘volume fraction’ is quite high. However, when the volume fraction is low, a fine numerical discretisation is normally required to identify the optimal form, which is computationally expensive. Worse, designers then have to perform time-consuming manual post-processing to deliver a clear component form and this can make the design workflow in Additive Manufacturing uneconomic for many companies. However, there is now an alternative means of generating truss-like forms that is significantly more direct and efficient.

A discrete optimisation approach

This new alternative to conventional topology optimisation involves a discrete (line-element) optimisation approach, employing layout optimisation (LO) and geometry optimisation (GO). This works particularly well when the engineer has a high degree of design freedom, as truss-like forms will generally be found to provide the most efficient design solutions. Smith et al. [1] recently demonstrated the approach, employing LO to obtain AM component designs. Also, GO can now potentially be applied in tandem with LO to obtain improved solutions, as described by He et al. [2]. The combined approach is shown in Fig. 2.

Accelerating AM component design workflow with new optimisation technology
Fig. 2 Discrete optimisation approach: (a) specify design domain, loading and support conditions; (b) discretisation using nodes; (c) interconnect nodes with line elements and use layout optimisation (LO) to identify the optimal arrangement of discrete members (shown in red/blue); (d) adjust joint positions to improve the solution

Once a line-element representation has been obtained, this can readily be transformed into a continuum model, suitable for further verification or manufacture, as indicated in Fig. 3. There are four key benefits of this discrete, line-element, optimisation approach:

  • Engineers can automatically generate a high-quality solid geometry CAD model, rather than a mesh geometry
  • Engineers can take steps to ensure that the optimised design is easy to be manufactured using AM processes. For example, they can specify in the optimisation that members should not be inclined at shallow angles to the horizontal
  • Engineers can easily check the absolute structural efficiency of the design, based on the subtended angles between members
  • Engineers can rapidly perform structural checks on the optimised form, such as global buckling stability checks.
Accelerating AM component design workflow with new optimisation technology
Fig. 3 Conversion of a line-element structure into a continuum (after Smith et al., 2016): (a) loft elements (e.g. as cylinders); (b) add joints; (c) expand joints to avoid stress concentrations

As ever, there is a trade-off between computational efficiency and optimisation capability. A pragmatic approach, adopted in the recently released LimitState:FORM software, is to use a relatively simple optimisation formulation – linear in the case of the LO phase. As a result, engineers can obtain solutions extremely quickly, typically in seconds or minutes. Engineers can then easily edit and analyse the resulting optimised line-element model, for example adjusting the design to remove thin elements, or checking global buckling stability. The discrete optimisation approach means that engineers can obtain a viable design very quickly after an initial optimisation. This is typically not the case when using topology optimisation.


The simple beam design shown in Fig. 4 was obtained automatically using LO, and was shown, through load testing [1] to be capable of carrying the target design load. In this case, specimens were manufactured using titanium Ti-6Al-4V via the Electron Beam Melting (EBM) process.

Accelerating AM component design workflow with new optimisation technology
Fig. 4 Simple beam (after Smith et al. 2016): (a) design; (b) fabricated component during a load test, and (c) load vs. displacement responses of tested components (target load = 100 kN)

The discrete optimisation approach was also recently used to develop a new airbrake hinge design for the Bloodhound supersonic car project, as shown in Fig. 5. The resulting design is almost 70% lighter than the original. Also, the use of GO and the ability to interactively edit the solution using LimitState:FORM led to a simpler form compared to that proposed previously by [1].

Accelerating AM component design workflow with new optimisation technology
Fig. 5 New design for Bloodhound airbrake hinge, obtained using the LimitState:FORM software


LimitState now offers a rapid and effective alternative to traditional optimisation techniques for AM components. The new discrete optimisation approach speeds up the process of identifying structurally efficient designs and is particularly suitable for problems where there is significant design freedom.

Discrete optimisation offers several key advantages over existing topology optimisation:

There is no need to specify a volume fraction in advance, avoiding the need to find an appropriate value by trial and error

  • Solutions can be obtained more rapidly, typically in seconds or minutes, rather than hours or days
  • It is possible to interact with the resulting optimised design, and to perform verification checks
  • The need for time-consuming remodelling of the solution is significantly reduced.

The approach helps to address one of the main obstacles to widespread adoption of AM, and the use of lightweight forms in manufacturing.


Matthew Gilbert
LimitState Ltd
217 Portobello
Sheffield S1 4DP,
UK Email: [email protected]


[1] Smith CJ, Gilbert M, Todd I & Derguti F, ‘Application of layout optimization to the design of additively manufactured metallic components’, Struct. Mult. Opt., 54(5), 1297–1313, 2016.

[2] He L, & Gilbert M, ‘Rationalization of trusses generated via layout optimization’, Struct. Mult. Opt., 52(4), 677-694, 2015.

[3] LimitState Ltd, LimitState:FORM software, 2016.

The financial support of EPSRC (project ref. EP/K025775/1) and Innovate UK (ANVIL project, ref. 101483) is acknowledged.

In the latest issue of Metal AM magazine

Download PDF

Extensive AM industry news coverage, as well as the following exclusive deep-dive articles:

  • Metal powders in Additive Manufacturing: An exploration of sustainable production, usage and recycling
  • Inside Wayland Additive: How innovation in electron beam PBF is opening new markets for AM
  • An end-to-end production case study: Leveraging data-driven machine learning and autonomous process control in AM
  • Consolidation, competition, and the cost of certification: Insight from New York’s AM Strategies 2024
  • Scandium’s impact on the Additive Manufacturing of aluminium alloys
  • AM for medical implants: An analysis of the impact of powder reuse in Powder Bed Fusion

The world of metal AM to your inbox

Don't miss any new issue of Metal AM magazine, and get the latest industry news. Sign up to our twice weekly newsletter.

Sign up

Discover our magazine archive…

The free to access Metal Additive Manufacturing magazine archive offers unparalleled insight into the world of metal Additive Manufacturing from a commercial and technological perspective through:

  • Reports on visits to leading metal AM part manufacturers and industry suppliers
  • Articles on technology and application trends
  • Information on materials developments
  • Reviews of key technical presentations from the international conference circuit
  • International industry news

All past issues are available to download as free PDFs or view in your browser.

Browse the archive

Looking for AM machines, metal powders or part manufacturing services?

Discover suppliers of these and more in our comprehensive advertisers’ index and buyer’s guide, available in the back of Metal AM magazine.

  • AM machines
  • Process monitoring & calibration
  • Heat treatment & sintering
  • HIP systems & services
  • Pre- & post-processing technology
  • Powders, powder production and analysis
  • Part manufacturers
  • Consulting, training & market data
View online
Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap