Research shows potential of EHLA in rapid alloy development

February 8, 2022

The in-situ powder supply of the EHLA process have Aachen researchers hopeful that it will prove beneficial in Rapid Alloy Development (Courtesy RWTH DAP/Irrmischer)

Researchers from the RWTH Aachen Chair for Digital Additive Production (DAP), RWTH Aachen University, Germany, have investigated the feasibility of using Extreme High-Speed Laser Material Deposition Process (EHLA) for efficiently screening and developing new alloys for Laser Beam Powder Bed Fusion (PBF-LB). By comparing process characteristics such as laser intensities and the resultant microstructures, the results have shown promising transferability between the processes manufacturing outcomes.

As processes, EHLA and PBF-LB mainly differ in powder supply mechanisms and places of laser energy input. In Laser Beam Powder Bed Fusion, the powder is applied globally in one layer and the laser spot is focused on this surface. In Extreme High-Speed Laser Material Deposition Process, the powder is applied locally via a nozzle and the powder focus is slightly above the deposition surface (approx. 1 mm); this means individual alloys can be conveyed and separately mixed in-situ before deposition.

Despite being the most utilised Additive Manufacturing technology, researchers worried that the potential of PBF-LB wasn’t exploited to its fullest because of the time- and material-consuming alloy development process. In an effort to speed up this process, Aachen researchers identified and investigated the relevant EHLA and PBF-LB process parameters that influence cooling rates and resultant microstructures. After this, they applied their theories to X30Mn22, a high-manganese steel. As the final step in this process, the microstructures of either sample were compared to review the process transferability.


Since the intensity of the energy input into the powder material has a major impact on the cooling rate, the interaction time between the powder and laser beam and the energy input into the material (i.e., laser intensity at laser spot) are calculated and compared for both processes.

Taking the laser power and laser spot diameter (Ø spot) into account, it was shown that the intensity in PBF-LB is almost 1fourteen times higher than in EHLA; the interaction time between material and laser beam in PBF-LB and EHLA, however, differ by an approximate factor of ten. For this reason, it is assumed that the effects of the different laser intensities are effectively balanced out, thus leading to a similar energy input per particles.

The researchers also determined the influence of the EHLA process speed on the cooling rate. To do this, the resultant dendrite arm spacings (DAS) of each process were measured and compared. By increasing the EHLA process speed from 50 to 150 m/min, the DAS is reduced from 1.29 µm to 0.58 µm, indicating that the cooling rate in EHLA is essentially dependent on the process speed.

A shows an EHLA melt pool in light microscope micrograph at a magnification of 100x; B shows a PBF-LB melt pool in LOM micrograph at 500x (Courtesy RWTH DAP)

Another value that was investigated was energy volume density (Ev) which can be used to compare the process characteristics of laser power, scanning speed and powder mass flow rate with regard to thermal balance. The calculated Ev for PBF-LB is about 2.3 times greater than the Ev for EHLA. However, the calculated Ev for PBF-LB only corresponds to a molten material quantity of a single layer thickness. Since the actual depth of molten material in the PBF-LB process is double or treble the layer thickness, the Ev must be accordingly increased. For this reason, the researchers assume that the heat balance is similar in both processes.

Further investigations on the different melt pool characteristics geometry and size show that the EHLA melt pool geometry measures a 25 times larger area than the geometry of PBF-LB’s melt pool. Additionally, the melt pool shapes differ; EHLA’s is rather flat compared to the PBF-LB melt pool. This is mainly due to the form of energy input of the two processes into the material and the heat dissipation from the melt pool into the substrate or the layers below.

Promising initial results

The researchers found that the microstructure of the manufactured samples is dendritic in both processes and the obtained dendrite arm spacings (DAS) are similar and can further be aligned by adapting process parameters such as process speed in EHLA. Therefore, it can be assumed that the resulting microstructures and mechanical properties are comparable for EHLA and PBF-LB.

Further investigations are expected to compare the chemical compositions of the manufactured samples obtained by the two processes. EHLA process parameters like particle velocity and powder mass flow will also be examined with regard to their influence on the resulting samples’ chemical properties. In addition, due to the difference in energy input, the evaporation behaviour of various alloys will be investigated and compared.

In summation, with regard to microstructural properties, the researchers have stated that these early results indicate that EHLA is suitable as an advanced alloy screening and development tool for PBF-LB.

About Metal Additive Manufacturing magazine

Metal AM magazine, published quarterly in digital and print formats, is read by a rapidly expanding international audience.

Our audience includes component manufacturers, end-users, materials and equipment suppliers, analysts, researchers and more.

In addition to providing extensive industry news coverage, Metal AM magazine is known for exclusive, in-depth articles and technical reports.

Our focus is the entire metal AM process from design to application.

Each issue is available as an easy-to-navigate digital edition and a high-quality print publication.

In the latest issue of Metal AM magazine

Download PDF

Extensive AM industry news coverage, as well as the following exclusive deep-dive articles:

  • BMW Group: Laying the foundations for the application of metal Additive Manufacturing in the automotive industry
  • Predicting the metal Additive Manufacturing market – and breaking the hype cycle
  • China’s thriving metal Additive Manufacturing industry: An outsider’s perspective
  • Enhancing the productivity of Additive Manufacturing facilities through PBF-LB automation
  • Award-winning metal AM parts from the MPIF’s 2024 Design Excellence Awards
  • Performance of eddy currents for the in-situ detection of defects during PBF-LB metal AM

The world of metal AM to your inbox

Don't miss any new issue of Metal AM magazine, and get the latest industry news. Sign up to our twice weekly newsletter.

Sign up

Looking for AM machines, metal powders or part manufacturing services?

Discover suppliers of these and more in our comprehensive advertisers’ index and buyer’s guide, available in the back of Metal AM magazine.

  • AM machines
  • Process monitoring & calibration
  • Heat treatment & sintering
  • HIP systems & services
  • Pre- & post-processing technology
  • Powders, powder production and analysis
  • Part manufacturers
  • Consulting, training & market data
View online

Discover our magazine archive…

The free to access Metal Additive Manufacturing magazine archive offers unparalleled insight into the world of metal Additive Manufacturing from a commercial and technological perspective through:

  • Reports on visits to leading metal AM part manufacturers and industry suppliers
  • Articles on technology and application trends
  • Information on materials developments
  • Reviews of key technical presentations from the international conference circuit
  • International industry news

All past issues are available to download as free PDFs or view in your browser.

Browse the archive

Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap